I’m sure some folks have heard of Film Biz Recycling before, but I found their mission and impact so compelling that I wanted to share. Film Biz Recycling is a non profit organization, creating socially responsible and sustainable solutions from media industry waste. They are tapping into an otherwise “hidden” area of waste generation; capturing stuff from film sets and stage productions that might otherwise have ended up in a landfill. I give them major props for creativity and for their impact in this sector. I just wish I lived in Brooklyn so that I could go shopping in their warehouse!
Month: February 2012
Sustainability non-profit GreenBlue has opened membership for its newly formed Forest Products Working Group, which brings together companies that rely on paper, wood, and other forest products to share their knowledge and develop new and sustainable business solutions. Packaging Asia
This article is by GreenBlue’s experimenters extraordinaire: Project Manager Adam Gendell and Project Associate Eric DesRoberts.
Back in August 2011 we serendipitously came across an oxo-degradable LDPE film wrap (for those of you who may not be enveloped in packaging lingo, that means it’s a thin piece of plastic with special additives that are activated under prolonged exposure to sunlight and oxygen to make the plastic film decompose into plastic dust, which may then be biodegraded by microbes).
Degradable plastic packaging like this is pretty controversial in the packaging community. In favor of oxo-degradable plastic is the argument that it will cease to persist in the environment if littered. Against oxo-degradables are arguments that the plastic dust is equally hazardous to human and environmental health, that they pose a risk to the plastic recycling stream because they downgrade the durability of the plastic with which they are mixed, and allegations that the degradability additives simply don’t work as advertised.
At GreenBlue we strive to maintain a level head and objective viewpoint, so we decided to conduct a scientific, on-the-ground (okay, on the roof) experiment to test the validity of the latter allegation that oxo-degradable additives don’t work. We did not measure the amount of sunlight and oxygen present, nor did we conduct multiple trials, nor did we use a non-degradable LDPE film as a control. What we did do is open a roof-accessible window in the GreenBlue office, place the film on the roof, throw some rocks on top of it to weigh it down, write down the date on which the “experiment” commenced, and proceeded to forget about it. About a week ago we had noted that 180 days had passed*, so we pulled it back in the office. It looked like this:
The film was definitely still recognizable as its original self, but noticeable fragmentation had indeed occurred. The film was brittle to the touch, and little bits of plastic ranging from quarter-size to dust-size were everywhere as pictured on the sticky note below.
Did we prove or disprove anything? Not really. We successfully littered little bits of plastic on the office roof, so we earnestly hope that they will continue to disintegrate until they are small enough to become a meal for some microorganisms. Our “test” results have suggested to us that this particular oxo-degradable additive works as advertised, and we threw it back out onto the roof for further observation.
It’s possible that the film may in fact disappear one day, but these authors remain skeptical that degradable plastics are a step in the direction of sustainability. After all, that LDPE film was likely made from petroleum resources, of which we only have a limited (and coveted) quantity. Can we find other ways to combat litter so that we can keep that valuable material from becoming dust in the wind?
* 180 days is the standard amount of time in which a compostable plastic is required to disintegrate completely, but oxo-degradable plastic is not intended to be compostable. Oxo-degradable manufacturers acknowledge that the time period necessary for total disintegration is considerably longer than 180 days, so it should not be expected that the film was supposed to have disappeared when we pulled it back in the office.
This year marks GreenBlue’s 10th anniversary. One way we plan to recognize this milestone is to organize a series of articles about the future of the sustainability, products, and business. At the end of our first decade, what will the next decade bring for GreenBlue and the broader sustainability movement?
Through the coming year, watch this space for features and interviews with visionaries, thought leaders, business innovators, scientists, and educators. The question we’ll put to everyone will be this: Over the next decade, what will be the most important ideas and trends that will advance business toward sustainability?
To kick it off, we took a stab at answering this question ourselves looking at product sustainability. Together, the whole staff identified nearly a hundred topics and narrowed them down to a handful. Here are GreenBlue’s top five topics that we believe will become increasingly important for product sustainability in the coming years.
1) Water is the new carbon
The United Nations calls water scarcity one of the most significant problems of the 21st century. Nearly half the world’s population—3.3 billion people—lacks access to clean water or soon will, and it’s only a matter of time before the rest of us feel the pinch. As water scarcity competes with carbon emissions for the public’s attention, the sustainability dialogue could shift from global issues such as climate change to local, community-based solutions in developing regions. Major multinationals already are taking action. Since 1999, Frito-Lay has cut its water use by 40%, and Coca-Cola plans to become “water neutral” by 2020.
2) Nature’s services get a price tag
The phrase “natural resources” often implies just the earth’s physical assets—water, fuel, materials, etc. But equally important are natural processes—the cleaning of water through the hydrologic cycle, for example—called “ecosystem services.” First formally defined by the United Nations in 2005, ecosystem services are declining, and their loss could become a significant market driver. Last month, the International Finance Corporation began requiring clients to “maintain the benefits from ecosystem services.” A project draining wetlands, for instance, would have to account for its impact not only on biodiversity but also on the loss of pollination services for surrounding farmers. The economics of a spike in True Cost Accounting could dramatically change how we do business.
3) Product transparency hits the tipping point
Despite the economic downturn, the demand for green products continues to rise, and with that demand comes more pressure for companies to disclose what’s in their products so that consumers can make more informed decisions. “We are approaching a tipping point,” declared the Financial Times in 2010, “beyond which everyone will want to know the provenance of their products.” Companies such as Patagonia, Method, Interface, and SC Johnson have led the pack with ingredient disclosure, and more and more businesses will follow suit.
4) Producer responsibility escalates
More aggressive ways to reduce waste and recover material at the end of a product’s useful life are increasingly urgent. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), or product stewardship, puts the burden of recovery on product makers, because, as the US EPA puts it, “manufacturers have the greatest ability, and therefore the greatest responsibility, to reduce the environmental impacts of their products.” Long required in many other countries, EPR is a growing trend here at home. To date, about two-thirds of the 50 states have product-specific EPR laws, and in 2010 Maine became the first state to enact a blanket EPR rule that in theory could apply to any product. The take-back programs of many electronics manufacturers and retailers, including IBM, Panasonic, Apple, Staples, and Best Buy, are reaping extraordinary financial benefits from the valuable scrap materials. From 2004 to 2009, Dell recovered 275 million pounds of computer equipment, and in the first year of its program Xerox saved over $50 million.
5) Planned obsolescence becomes obsolete
The making of products, compared to their use, has an enormous environmental impact. Manufacturing consumer electronics, such as cell phones and computers, accounts for about 80 percent of the total energy consumption of those products. Yet, the average life of a cell phone is 18 months, and many companies bank on continual churn to sell more of their latest releases. Nokia estimates that extending the life expectancy of a mobile phone by a year could cut its total energy consumption by more than 40 percent, and other sources suggest that continuing to use a computer can mean 20 times greater energy savings than recycling it. More companies could improve environmental performance and customer satisfaction at the same time by making their products easier to upgrade. Julius Tarng’s Modai concept phone includes modular internals that can be replaced easily without discarding the whole phone. Brand loyalty could get replaced by object loyalty.
The materials we use in our society are valuable. Yet in the U.S., we only recover about one third of municipal solid waste annually. Packaging materials represent a large and visible part of this waste stream. How can we capture the value of those materials instead of throwing them away after a single use? Packaging Digest
I love well-designed space, which for me marries form and function and is simple, elegant, and pleasing to the eye. I have been following the Tumbleweed Tiny House Company for several years and specifically like owner Jay Shafer’s series of small homes built on utility trailers. They are beautifully crafted and every inch well used. My favorite—the Fencl—is the largest at 130 square feet of living space plus a sleeping loft with a bit of storage and room for a queen size mattress.
Tumbleweed is based in California; they hold open houses from time to time but until recently none close to Charlottesville, VA. So, when I read about an open house featuring the Fencl within semi-reasonable driving distance (20 hours round-trip in two days), I literally jumped into my car and went. My destination: a small town in the foothills of the Adirondacks, Woodgate, New York, where Bill Rockhill of Bear Creek Carpentry was exhibiting the Fencl he built with the intent to sell to a Tumbleweed Tiny home lover.
I attempted to rope others into this trip but was successful in convincing only one: my dog (and really all I had to do was open the car door and say, “let’s go”). We arrived in Woodgate around 1:30 pm, just a half hour after the after the start of the open house, and there were already 20 or so people milling about. I have been imagining what it would be like to live in an 8×19 space—going as far as taping off the dimensions on my living room floor—but nothing compares to the actual experience.
The inside of the Fencl was open and airy and very cozy. The heat was provided by a small Dickinson propane heater (it looks like a small gas fireplace and typically used on boats and RVs). After touring the home, I had only one concern: could my cat and dog exist in the space peacefully?
The cost to build the Fencl yourself is just $23,000, or less if you take advantage of used or recycled materials. I really like the idea of purchasing materials as I can afford them and then building my home along this timeline. Another great feature: you can configure your home to tie into local utilities or adapt it to living off the grid. A home on wheels also appeals to the nomad in me. In my nomadic dream, I envision little plots of land across the US with drive up porches.
More information:
Tumbleweed website
Blog post about the Fencl Open House with photo tour
I recently returned from a week-long trip aboard the MSC Poescia, as staff for the music festival Jam Cruise, managed by Cloud 9 Adventures. This was my fourth year on the boat, where my duties include administration of the “Conscious Cruiser” program and Volunteer Management under the nonprofit arm of Cloud 9, called Positive Legacy.
While clearly cruise ships are far from being ecologically beneficial, I continue to be impressed by what Positive Legacy has been able to accomplish in both the social responsibility and environmental awareness arenas. Despite restrictive regulations, the team was able to bring back PLA cups for composting, as well as recycling glass, plastic, aluminum, and for the first time, corrugated cardboard in the Ft. Lauderdale area. The rest of the waste goes to Broward County’s Waste-to-Energy plant (with the exception of food waste, which is discarded at sea).
Social impacts at ports is another issue altogether, and the Positive Legacy team focuses many of its resources on the needs of local populations. All of Cloud 9’s events include some type of social outreach, meaningful carbon offsetting for both the ship and its patrons, and needed donations. In Haiti, the team worked with a local organization and cruise patrons in an interesting intersection between packaging and local issues: 10,000 orange seeds were planted in plastic bottles that were fished out of local waterways. There was great enthusiasm for this endeavor, as one can see in the pictures.
That reminded me of a friend’s picture from Guatemala, where building walls are constructed using plastic bottles filled with other discarded packaging (see picture). There has also been an interesting set of videos circulating, where plastic bottles were used in areas with limited electricity to bring light into homes. The author refers to the interesting term “instinctive design,” which, she notes, is not always the best solution but often the most realistic.
I am torn with these uses and the implications. On the one hand, cruise ships will continue to exist and not all bottles get recycled, so why not continue to seek out ingenious ways to give back and help local resources? On the other hand, clearly cruise ships need to make improvements in many areas, including wastewater treatment, and recycling infrastructures are sorely needed in the types of communities cruise ships visit. The work of Positive Legacy and many organizations like it should not be seen as the perfect solution, but a step in the right direction towards a more sustainable global future.
It is imperative that we draw upon the ingenuity of these local, instinctive designers to help eliminate wasteful practices and litter towards developing sustainable materials management solutions.