Categories
GreenBlue

Jammin’ for Data – working to increase material transparency

The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) held its first “Data Jam” event on June 27, 2014 in Chicago during the week of the AIA conference. So what is a Data Jam you may ask?
In this particular case, it was a gathering of data geeks who are diligently if not enthusiastically working to increase material transparency by providing more and better information to the marketplace. In support of the USGBC’s new Material and Resource credits for LEED v4.0, they brought together for profit and nonprofit organizations representing the diversity of data aggregation, tools, and service providers that have emerged over the past 15 years. Most of these resources are dedicated to helping manufacturers collect and manage data related to health hazards and risk assessments, environmental impact or life cycle assessments, specification and purchasing, as well as other categories that employ sustainability strategies to increase planetary health, while reducing business risk.
The USGBC asked all participants to fill out a survey in advance of our Jam session in order to get our perspective on what the data needs may be for industry and the marketplace. While the results of the survey did not reveal any significant surprises, the USGBC’s efforts to get consensus and a sense of prioritization of these needs and potential solutions was very useful. Below were the two core questions, along with responses in order of importance to the data jam participants:
What does the INDUSTRY need to advance health and environmental issues in building materials selection and manufacturing?

  1. More data (e.g. product ingredient lists, data on health impacts)
  2. Better tools (e.g. databases, assessment methodologies)
  3. Consumer demand for information
  4. Better data standardization (e.g. standards for data and meta-data reporting)
  5. Expertise interpreting data (e.g. experts trained in analyzing data)

For the #1 INDUSTRY NEED selected above, what is the best way to address this need?

  1. Greater industry cooperation around proprietary information
  2. Cross industry collaboration (e.g., more activities like this data jam)
  3. Improved consumer education
  4. More funding
  5. Reduction in cost (e.g., cost of access to data)

All respondents agreed that material transparency is dependent on increased access to data as well as a diversity of tools and resources designed to provide greater access. Data standardization and better translation of toxicological data into useful information for multiple audiences are also essential ingredients for transparency.
The USGBC event brought together an impressive list of stakeholders who are working on solutions to increase transparency. With that said, the stakeholder group that continues to be poorly represented in all of these meetings I’ve attended are the suppliers who make not only the finished products but also all of the intermediate products that go into the finished product. The only way we will successfully characterize finished products is by reaching far upstream in the value chain to define all of their root level inputs (i.e., mixtures or formulated products and materials, “articles”, that make up complex components and assemblies).
Suppliers of these intermediate products are our primary partners in this endeavor, and as we plan future meetings and data jams, we need to find a better way to get this group at the table. Only with all of these perspectives represented, we will be able to truly assess the best ways to design and implement a more transparent and effective system for communicating the human and environmental health attributes of products.
Take a look at the Material IQ website to learn more about how GreenBlue is working to advance transparency.

Categories
Recover More Sustainable Packaging Coalition

Having a BIG Conversation on the Future of Plastics

This is exactly how Plasticity, a one day forum in NYC I recently attended, was billed, and it delivered. Throughout the day, the speakers and panelists, of which I was one, remained focused on the big picture and solutions for the future; and with good reason. The sustainability advocacy NGO, As You Sow estimates that “over $8 billion in value from packaging alone is left on the table when plastic packaging is sent to landfill.”
With impressive representation from around the globe – from Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, the UK, Canada, Costa Rica – the approximately 150 speakers and attendees approached the topic of plastics from a range of perspectives, but with a common starting point: plastics are a valuable resource that are versatile, affordable, convenient and likely inextricable from our everyday lives. In other words, this was not a bash plastics and ban polymers event. Instead, it was a call to recognize plastics as having a considerable role in our materials economy, and a clarion call to stop designing plastics to be thrown away. It was also an exciting exploration of the challenges,  opportunities and emerging solutions businesses, NGOs and governments are collaborating on to create the very necessary closed loop for both polymers in the market today and those that will be in the market tomorrow (e.g., biopolymers).
Doug Woodring, founder of The Ocean Recovery Alliance and Plastics Disclosure Project hosted the event. Notables in the sustainability, plastics and recovery arenas such as Bill McDonough, Cradle2Cradle; Steve Russell, American Chemistry Council; and Mike Biddle, MBA Polymers, topped the roster of speakers, which also included a former president of Costa Rica, the head of UK-based TruCost, a lead innovator from Ecovative, and an amazing waste to product (and even buildings) designer from Miniwiz, among others.
The event showcased ideas and latest developments in:

  • Using waste as a resource
  • Scalable, best practice innovations
  • Use of new materials
  • Designing for sustainability and
  • Solutions for reducing the plastic footprint

As part of a panel on designing for recovery, I kicked off the session by sharing the Sustainable Packaging Coalition’s (SPC) Definition of Sustainable Packaging, which can apply seamlessly to products as well. I also discussed the extended parameters designers need to consider beyond the more traditional criteria of cost, performance, quality, aesthetics, and regulatory compliance. These included optimizing resources, responsible sourcing, material health and resource recovery. My copanelists Stephan Clambaneva representing the Industrial Designers Society of America, and Arthur Huang, CEO and Founder of Miniwiz, picked up on the theme of expanded parameters. Huang has even applied expanded parameters to structures, using his company’s trash-to-product material, POLLI-BRICKS to construct a waste recycling facility in Taiwan.
Cool and sexy waste-to-product goods from Waste2Wear, Ekocycle, and Miniwiz were on display, including Miniwiz’s “made from 100% trash” sunglasses that attendees sported to tame the evening sun glare and enjoy views of the new Freedom Tower from the rooftop reception venue.
miniwiz_recycled_sunglasses
Consumer education was another theme of the event, as we all play a major role in closing the loop on all materials. Waste2Wear’s child educational video was a great example.
The NYC Forum was the 3rd annual Plasticity event. Woodring promises to key the dialogue going and is considering Barcelona, Spain as the next locale. I sure hope to catch up with some of you there.

Categories
Sustainable Packaging Coalition Uncategorized

2014 Summer Fancy Food Show: More than just a tasty opportunity

When the Specialty Food Association contacted the Sustainable Packaging Coalition looking for Summer Fancy Food Show (SFFS) speakers, I was pretty excited to grab the gig. Fancy food and a whole new group of faces to educate? I’m in.
On June 30, 2014, I attended and spoke at SFFS in New York City. The show was a mix of over 15 sessions and seminars, a show floor of 2,400 exhibitors, and over 24,000 attendees. It was also SPC’s first time working with the Specialty Food Association and the Fancy Food Show. I love fancy food as much as the next person, but it was more than just a tasty opportunity. SFFS was a chance to educate a new crowd and observe an industry with great sustainability potential.
SFFS14 Education Program
The day began with me teaching a one hour session, Sustainable Packaging: What’s New? How Does it Affect Your Business? SPC member Steve Mahler of Caraustar leant a hand during the session and Q&A, offering his unique industry and SPC member perspective. The group was diverse and inquisitive, sticking around to ask more questions. I spent the rest of the day walking the show floor, tasting samples, and talking to vendors.
Everyone has a story
From packaging to product, everyone had a story to share.
The creator of Energyfruits saw parents eating their children’s food products and decided to develop an “adult version.” Admittedly, it felt a little bit like my Capri Sun days, but I could get used to this. It was a convenient counterbalance to all of the sweet treats. Unfortunately, end of life recovery options for flexible pouches remain slim. This was just one of many pouch packages, highlighting the hurdle, and opportunity, in flexible packaging.
Mason_Jar_Coookie_Company
The Mason Jar Cookie Company uses their packaging as a defining brand identity. Cookie mix comes in a clear container, with layered ingredients creating an attractive display. As a consumer, it had a familiar “southern feel,” and I can never have too many mason jars. This company connected with me on a personal level, a great asset to creating brand loyalty.
A similar packaging-driving-brand-loyalty example is Salem Baking Company’s cookie tubes. I grew up eating Salem’s Moravian Sugar Cookies in the iconic tubes. It was uplifting to see so many flavors and products. It was icing on the cake for them to ask what I thought about the sustainability of their packaging.
salem-baking-company-moravian-cookies
The 2014 Summer Fancy Food Show was a great event, and I look forward to working more with this new group of faces.

Categories
Uncategorized

Moving Beyond Forest Certification: Interview with Domtar

Our Forest Certification Innovation Summit, held in Charlotte, NC on June 12, brought together over 60 representatives from across the forest products supply chain and lit the path forward for GreenBlue’s Forest Products Working Group’s ongoing effort to define the value of forest certification. As an immediate follow-up, we talked with some of the event’s sponsors to hear their perspectives on the event. While informal, the interviews are intended to provide insights from different supply chain positions on the major takeaways from the event, as well as explain how this kind of event can help advance the forest products industry.
For the first interview in our series, we sat down with Lisa Stocker, Sustainable Business Manager for Domtar. The Summit was conducted under the Chatham House Rule, so names and organizations will not be attributed to any of the specifics recalled from the event.
Lisa_Stocker_Domtar
GreenBlue: Can you tell us a little about Domtar and how you fit into the forest products industry? Where do you fall in the value chain?
Lisa Stocker: We are the largest integrated marketer and manufacturer of uncoated freesheet paper in North America. We have 13 pulp and paper mills, nine in the United States and four in Canada, with an annual paper production capacity of approximately 3.4 million tons of uncoated paper. Our paper manufacturing operations are supported by 15 converting and distribution operations.
Domtar is next in line behind landowners, forest managers and loggers in the value chain. We rely on wood fiber that comes from actively managed forests owned by our neighbors in the communities surrounding our mills. Most of the wood that goes into the manufacturing process is derived from small pulpwood trees or residual waste generated when local sawmills process logs into lumber. Professional loggers and foresters who work with landowners to maintain ecological values like wildlife habitat and water quality are crucial partners in our supply chain.
The Summit brought together stakeholders from across the forest products supply chain to define the value of forest certification. What were some of your impressions from the discussion tables and interactions with the various value chain members?
I was very impressed by the open and constructive conversations between the wide ranging attendees who had never before been represented in the same room together. I thought the dialogue was rich and revealing, particularly as those from each end of the value chain articulated their respective goals and objectives to each other. I heard common sentiments about the importance of responsible land stewardship, economic value, and community viability.
What do you think were some successes of the Summit and what would you have liked to seen done better?
Certainly, the greatest success was the creation of a comfortable forum for passionate and respectful dialogue, active participation and enthusiasm for the next step. In future sessions, I would like to see even greater landowner and lumber market participation, and inclusion of more NGO stakeholders.
You have been involved in this project since the very beginning, from your perspective, what do you see as the critical next steps for this project?
Action! It strikes me that everyone in the value chain cares about keeping forests as working forests, seeks a return on investment, and recognizes the social value of our community cultures within which we each work and live. Within that overarching common framework, we should be able to create a solution that affirms landowner goals, maintains the economic engines in our communities and provides brand owners with independently verified certainty that the supply chain is indeed sustainable. We can do this!
One of the things that came up in the Summit discussions was expanding the scope of the value chain that we are currently working with. Are there any sectors or specific organizations that you think should be engaged in this work?
As I mentioned earlier, the supply chain for other product sectors that rely on the forest should be part of this conversation. That would include the higher value solid wood sector that begins the pipeline for lumber, engineered wood products, furniture, flooring and other products used by consumers across the globe. I also think that environmental organizations and foundations with similar missions and values should be engaged.
Lisa, I want to thank you and Domtar again for helping us put on the Summit. Is there anything else that you would like to mention about the Summit or project?
Just that there is no question in my mind that this project is necessary and success is vital to maintain the forests and social fabric of North America.
We definitely agree on that last point! Thanks again for taking the time to talk with us; we are looking forward to continuing to work with you.